euthanasia: is social issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, law
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, nazism
Weight: 0.32
, torture
Weight: 0.32
, masturbation
Weight: 0.32
, cloning
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social issue 1.00
is social justice issue 0.90
is issue 0.88
is important issue 0.87
is legal issue 0.85
is moral issue 0.84
is ethical issue 0.83
be problem in society 0.80
be ethical issue in new zealand 0.76
is ethical dilemma 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(torture, is social justice issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(torture, is ethical issue)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(torture, is important issue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cloning, is issue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(torture, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(torture, is issue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(torture, is issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cloning, is issue)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cloning, is issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(torture, is important issue)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(torture, is important issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(torture, is social justice issue)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(torture, is social justice issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(torture, is ethical issue)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(torture, is ethical issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is important issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is legal issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be problem in society)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, be ethical issue in new zealand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is legal issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be problem in society)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is legal issue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is moral issue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be problem in society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is legal issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(euthanasia, be ethical issue in new zealand)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is ethical issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be problem in society)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is ethical issue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is ethical dilemma)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, be ethical issue in new zealand)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(euthanasia, is important issue)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(euthanasia, is important issue)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(euthanasia, be ethical issue in new zealand)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is important issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(euthanasia, is social issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(torture, is issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cloning, is issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(torture, is social justice issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(torture, is ethical issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(euthanasia, is social issue)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(torture, is important issue)