evaluation: be essential at phase

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.66
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, document
Weight: 0.61
, discipline
Weight: 0.58
, recommendation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings appraisal
Weight: 0.60
, observation
Weight: 0.33
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, orientation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be essential at phase 1.00
be essential at phase of project 0.95
be essential for organisation 0.85
is essential 0.84
be crucial to process 0.83
be important in hrm process 0.80
be necessary in system 0.79
be crucial to scientific process 0.79
is necessary 0.78
be important in theatre 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(discipline, be essential for organisation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(discipline, is essential)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(discipline, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(discipline, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(discipline, is essential)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(discipline, be essential for organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be essential for organisation)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is essential)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in theatre)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(documentation, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(discipline, be essential for organisation)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(discipline, is essential)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(discipline, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(documentation, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(documentation, is necessary)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(orientation, be important in hrm process)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(observation, be important in theatre)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in theatre)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(evaluation, be necessary in system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(evaluation, is necessary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be necessary in system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is necessary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(evaluation, be necessary in system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(evaluation, is necessary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be necessary in system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(discipline, is necessary)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(discipline, is essential)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(discipline, be essential for organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(documentation, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(observation, be important in theatre)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraisal, is essential)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(discipline, is necessary)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(discipline, is essential)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(discipline, be essential for organisation)