evaluation: be essential at phase of project

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.66
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, document
Weight: 0.61
, discipline
Weight: 0.58
, recommendation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings appraisal
Weight: 0.60
, observation
Weight: 0.33
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, orientation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be essential at phase of project 1.00
be essential at phase 0.95
be important in design process 0.81
be important in hrm process 0.80
be crucial to process 0.80
be essential for organisation 0.78
be crucial to scientific process 0.77
attributes assist in project management 0.77
be important in study of child development 0.77
is essential 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(discipline, be essential for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(discipline, is essential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(activity, attributes assist in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(activity, attributes assist in project management)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(discipline, is essential)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(discipline, be essential for organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be essential for organisation)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(discipline, is essential)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(activity, attributes assist in project management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in study of child development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(discipline, be essential for organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(discipline, is essential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(activity, attributes assist in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(orientation, be important in hrm process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(appraisal, is essential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(observation, be important in study of child development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in study of child development)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(evaluation, be important in design process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be important in design process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important in design process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important in design process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(activity, attributes assist in project management)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(discipline, is essential)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(discipline, be essential for organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraisal, is essential)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(observation, be important in study of child development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(activity, attributes assist in project management)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(discipline, is essential)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(evaluation, be essential at phase of project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(discipline, be essential for organisation)