evidence: be important in argument

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents justification
Weight: 0.67
, material
Weight: 0.66
, confession
Weight: 0.65
, documentation
Weight: 0.64
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, doubt
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.64
, transcript
Weight: 0.64
, fingerprint
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in argument 1.00
be crucial to arguments 0.87
constructing argument 0.84
be crucial to ethical arguments 0.83
constructing sound argument 0.83
be important in case 0.80
support theory 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(justification, be crucial to ethical arguments)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(evidence, be important in argument)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(justification, be crucial to arguments)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(evidence, be important in argument)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(justification, be crucial to arguments)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(justification, be crucial to ethical arguments)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(justification, be crucial to ethical arguments)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(justification, be crucial to arguments)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(justification, be crucial to ethical arguments)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(evidence, be important in argument)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(justification, be crucial to arguments)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(evidence, be important in argument)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(evidence, be important in argument)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(evidence, constructing sound argument)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(evidence, constructing sound argument)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(evidence, constructing sound argument)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(evidence, constructing sound argument)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(evidence, support theory)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(evidence, support theory)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(evidence, support theory)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evidence, support theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(evidence, be important in argument)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(justification, be crucial to arguments)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(justification, be crucial to ethical arguments)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(justification, be crucial to arguments)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(evidence, be important in argument)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(justification, be crucial to ethical arguments)