evil: be more attractive than good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, theme
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.57
Siblings corruption
Weight: 0.64
, masturbation
Weight: 0.63
, segregation
Weight: 0.61
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.60
, inequality
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more attractive than good 1.00
is attractive 0.91
be more powerful than good 0.87
be easier than good 0.86
be attracted to good 0.79
be superior to good 0.79
is more pleasurable 0.77
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(segregation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(segregation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(segregation, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, be easier than good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(evil, is attractive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(evil, be more powerful than good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(evil, be easier than good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be easier than good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(evil, be more powerful than good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more powerful than good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(evil, is attractive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(evil, is attractive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(evil, be attracted to good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, be attracted to good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(evil, be attracted to good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, be superior to good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(evil, be superior to good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, be superior to good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(evil, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(evil, is attractive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(evil, be easier than good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(evil, be more powerful than good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(evil, be attracted to good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(evil, be superior to good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(segregation, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)