evolution: be different from natural selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.65
, process
Weight: 0.64
, change
Weight: 0.63
, belief
Weight: 0.62
, journal
Weight: 0.61
Siblings transformation
Weight: 0.35
, speciation
Weight: 0.34
, convergence
Weight: 0.34
, singularity
Weight: 0.33
, theory
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from natural selection 1.00
be by natural selection 0.96
be by natural selection called 0.95
be different from selection 0.95
be result of natural selection 0.92
exist without natural selection 0.91
be by natural selection viewed 0.91
be influenced by natural selection 0.91
theory of is natural selection 0.90
theory of is natural selection related 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(evolution, be different from natural selection)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(evolution, exist without natural selection)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(evolution, be influenced by natural selection)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evolution, exist without natural selection)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(evolution, exist without natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(evolution, exist without natural selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(evolution, be influenced by natural selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(evolution, be influenced by natural selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be influenced by natural selection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be different from natural selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, be different from natural selection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(evolution, be different from natural selection)