evolution: be good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.65
, process
Weight: 0.64
, change
Weight: 0.63
, belief
Weight: 0.62
, journal
Weight: 0.61
Siblings singularity
Weight: 0.33
, theory
Weight: 0.33
, development
Weight: 0.33
, revolution
Weight: 0.33
, nature
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good 1.00
be at good as rest 0.86
be wonderful 0.79
be very hard 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(change, be at good as rest)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(evolution, be good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(belief, be good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(evolution, be good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(belief, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(change, be at good as rest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(change, be at good as rest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(belief, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nature, be very hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nature, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nature, be wonderful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(belief, be good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(evolution, be good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(change, be at good as rest)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(evolution, be good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nature, be good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nature, be good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nature, be wonderful)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nature, be wonderful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(nature, be very hard)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nature, be very hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(evolution, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(evolution, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(belief, be good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(change, be at good as rest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nature, be good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nature, be wonderful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nature, be very hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(belief, be good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(evolution, be good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(change, be at good as rest)