evolution: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.65
, process
Weight: 0.64
, change
Weight: 0.63
, belief
Weight: 0.62
, journal
Weight: 0.61
Siblings transformation
Weight: 0.35
, speciation
Weight: 0.34
, convergence
Weight: 0.34
, singularity
Weight: 0.33
, theory
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
change something 0.79
be explained in silly ways 0.77
is scary 0.76
be pretty much set in stone 0.76
has quality bad 0.75
is hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(change, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evolution, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(journal, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evolution, is good thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(concept, be explained in silly ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evolution, is good thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evolution, is good thing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(change, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evolution, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(change, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(concept, be explained in silly ways)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(journal, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(change, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(change, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(journal, is hard)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(concept, be explained in silly ways)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(change, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(speciation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(concept, be explained in silly ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(evolution, is good thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(change, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(evolution, is good thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(journal, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(evolution, is good thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(evolution, is good thing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(change, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(evolution, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(speciation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(speciation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(evolution, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evolution, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(change, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(concept, be explained in silly ways)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(journal, is hard)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(change, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(speciation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(change, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(concept, be explained in silly ways)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(journal, is hard)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(evolution, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(change, is hard)