example: be short in top 5

Related concepts

Parents	instance Weight: 0.78 , illustration Weight: 0.74 , experiment Weight: 0.68 , reason Weight: 0.66
Siblings	model Weight: 0.65 , mass effect Weight: 0.65 , opportunity Weight: 0.64 , piece Weight: 0.62 , wise man Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be short in top 5	1.00
be short	0.85
be 3 on wiiu	0.83
have short hair	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(example, be short in top 5) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(mass effect, be 3 on wiiu)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(example, be short in top 5) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(mass effect, be 3 on wiiu) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(mass effect, be 3 on wiiu)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(example, be short in top 5) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(example, be short in top 5)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(example, be short in top 5) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(example, be short in top 5) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(example, be short in top 5)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(example, be short in top 5) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(example, be short in top 5)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(example, be short in top 5) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(mass effect, be 3 on wiiu)