excess: be detrimental for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amount
Weight: 0.53
, factor
Weight: 0.51
, vice
Weight: 0.50
, insurance
Weight: 0.49
Siblings indulgence
Weight: 0.51
, increase
Weight: 0.31
, reduction
Weight: 0.31
, decrease
Weight: 0.31
, accumulation
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be detrimental for environment 1.00
be beneficial 0.82
be beneficial for life 0.82
affect climate 0.78
have impact on development 0.76
have effect on ecosystem 0.75
be important for climate 0.75
affect health 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amount, be beneficial for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(amount, be beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(amount, be important for climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(amount, affect climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(amount, affect climate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(factor, affect health)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(amount, be beneficial)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(amount, be beneficial for life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(amount, be important for climate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact on development)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(amount, be beneficial for life)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amount, be important for climate)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(amount, be beneficial)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amount, affect climate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect health)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(increase, have effect on ecosystem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amount, be beneficial for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(amount, be beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(amount, affect climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(amount, be important for climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(increase, have effect on ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(increase, have effect on ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(excess, be detrimental for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(amount, affect climate)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, affect health)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(amount, be beneficial)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(amount, be beneficial for life)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(amount, be important for climate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(increase, have effect on ecosystem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(amount, affect climate)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, affect health)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(amount, be beneficial)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(amount, be beneficial for life)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(excess, be detrimental for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(amount, be important for climate)