expansion: be put use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.69
, construction
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, growth
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, restoration
Weight: 0.33
, revision
Weight: 0.33
, consolidation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be put use 1.00
use 110v 0.85
was in use 0.81
be used 0.77
seem take 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(expansion, be put use)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(project, seem take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(expansion, be put use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(project, seem take)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(project, seem take)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(factor, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(construction site, use 110v)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(expansion, be put use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(project, seem take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(expansion, be put use)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(construction site, use 110v) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(construction site, use 110v)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(expansion, be put use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be put use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(expansion, be put use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(project, seem take)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(construction site, use 110v)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(expansion, be put use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(project, seem take)