expedition: be cheaper than suburbans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trip
Weight: 0.67
, project
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.58
, challenge
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sherpa
Weight: 0.41
, mission
Weight: 0.34
, trek
Weight: 0.33
, hiking
Weight: 0.32
, rafting
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than suburbans 1.00
is cheaper 0.90
be cheaper on end 0.86
is expensive 0.81
be cheaper than flights 0.81
be cheaper than direct flights 0.79
is cheap 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(trip, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(trip, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trip, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trip, be cheaper than flights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trip, be cheaper than direct flights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(trip, be cheaper than flights)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(trip, be cheaper than direct flights)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(trip, is cheaper)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(trip, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(trip, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trip, is cheaper)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trip, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trip, be cheaper than direct flights)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trip, is cheap)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(trip, be cheaper than flights)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rafting, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(trip, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(trip, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trip, be cheaper than flights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trip, be cheaper than direct flights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trip, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hiking, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hiking, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sherpa, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sherpa, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rafting, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rafting, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(expedition, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(expedition, is cheap)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(expedition, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(expedition, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(trip, be cheaper than flights)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(trip, be cheaper than direct flights)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trip, is cheaper)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trip, is expensive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(trip, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rafting, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hiking, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(sherpa, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(trip, be cheaper than flights)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(trip, be cheaper than direct flights)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trip, is cheaper)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trip, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(trip, is cheap)