expedition: be good map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trip
Weight: 0.67
, project
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.58
, challenge
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sherpa
Weight: 0.41
, mission
Weight: 0.34
, trek
Weight: 0.33
, hiking
Weight: 0.32
, rafting
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good map 1.00
is map 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be good map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rafting, is map)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(expedition, be good map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(rafting, is map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rafting, is map)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(expedition, be good map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(expedition, be good map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(expedition, be good map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(expedition, be good map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be good map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(expedition, be good map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(expedition, be good map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be good map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rafting, is map)