expedition: is cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trip
Weight: 0.67
, project
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.58
, challenge
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sherpa
Weight: 0.41
, mission
Weight: 0.34
, trek
Weight: 0.33
, hiking
Weight: 0.32
, rafting
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheap 1.00
is deal cheap 0.90
be to china cheap 0.86
is cheaper 0.83
be cheaper on end 0.79
is expensive 0.79
be cheaper than suburbans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trip, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(trip, is deal cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(trip, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(trip, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(trip, be to china cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(trip, is cheap)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(trip, is deal cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(trip, be to china cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(trip, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(trip, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(project, be cheaper on end)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(trip, be to china cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trip, is cheap)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trip, is deal cheap)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trip, is cheaper)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(trip, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rafting, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(trip, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(trip, is deal cheap)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(trip, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(trip, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(trip, be to china cheap)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, be cheaper on end)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(expedition, is cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hiking, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hiking, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sherpa, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sherpa, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rafting, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rafting, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(expedition, is cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(expedition, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(expedition, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(expedition, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expedition, be cheaper than suburbans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expedition, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(trip, be to china cheap)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(trip, is cheap)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trip, is deal cheap)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trip, is cheaper)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trip, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rafting, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hiking, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(sherpa, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(trip, is cheap)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trip, is deal cheap)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(trip, be to china cheap)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(project, be cheaper on end)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trip, is cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(expedition, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trip, is expensive)