experience: be divided among party

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attribute
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.65
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings confidence
Weight: 0.63
, chemistry
Weight: 0.63
, attention
Weight: 0.62
, seminar
Weight: 0.62
, achievement
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be divided among party 1.00
be distributed among party members 0.87
be actually divided in groups 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(experience, be divided among party)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(experience, be actually divided in groups)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(experience, be actually divided in groups)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(experience, be actually divided in groups)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(experience, be actually divided in groups)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(experience, be distributed among party members)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(experience, be distributed among party members)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(experience, be distributed among party members)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(experience, be distributed among party members)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(experience, be divided among party)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be divided among party)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(experience, be divided among party)