experience: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	attribute Weight: 0.65 , tool Weight: 0.65 , asset Weight: 0.64 , philosophy Weight: 0.64
Siblings	confidence Weight: 0.63 , chemistry Weight: 0.63 , attention Weight: 0.62 , seminar Weight: 0.62 , achievement Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality better	0.94
be good for job	0.78
is superior	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(philosophy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(philosophy, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(achievement, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(confidence, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(philosophy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(confidence, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(confidence, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(achievement, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(achievement, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(experience, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(experience, has quality bad)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(experience, has quality better)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(experience, be good for job)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(experience, is superior)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(experience, is superior)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(experience, be good for job)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(experience, is superior)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(experience, be good for job)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(experience, be good for job)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(experience, is superior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(philosophy, has quality good)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(confidence, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(achievement, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(philosophy, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(experience, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)