experiment: be at laboratory

Related concepts

Parents	observation Weight: 0.65 , thing Weight: 0.61 , concept Weight: 0.60 , process Weight: 0.57 , success Weight: 0.56
Siblings	test Weight: 0.69 , method Weight: 0.32 , evolution Weight: 0.32 , what Weight: 0.32 , theory Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at laboratory	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(experiment, be at laboratory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(test, be at laboratory)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(experiment, be at laboratory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(test, be at laboratory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(test, be at laboratory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(experiment, be at laboratory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(experiment, be at laboratory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(experiment, be at laboratory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(experiment, be at laboratory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(experiment, be at laboratory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(experiment, be at laboratory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(experiment, be at laboratory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(experiment, be at laboratory) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(test, be at laboratory)