experiment: be valuable to scientist

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents observation
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, process
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lux
Weight: 0.46
, string theory
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable to scientist 1.00
be important in science 0.78
be important to scientific study 0.77
be important in research 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(observation, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, be valuable to scientist)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(observation, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(experiment, be valuable to scientist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(experiment, be valuable to scientist)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(experiment, be important in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(experiment, be important to scientific study)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(experiment, be important in research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(experiment, be important in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(experiment, be important in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(experiment, be important in research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(experiment, be important to scientific study)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(experiment, be important to scientific study)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(experiment, be important in research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be important to scientific study)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be important in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be important in research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be valuable to scientist)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, be valuable to scientist)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(observation, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(experiment, be valuable to scientist)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(observation, be important in science)