expert: answer lot of question

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings analyst
Weight: 0.76
, author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
answer lot of question 1.00
answer that question 0.96
answer question 0.96
answer tough question 0.92
object to question 0.84
question that theory 0.84
question theory 0.83
object to line of question 0.83
tell lot 0.81
supply that answer 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question theory)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(scientist, question theory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(scientist, question theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(expert, answer lot of question)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(expert, answer that question)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(expert, answer question)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(expert, answer tough question)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(expert, answer question)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(expert, answer that question)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(expert, tell lot)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(expert, supply that answer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(expert, tell lot)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(expert, supply that answer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(expert, supply that answer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(expert, supply that answer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(expert, answer tough question)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(expert, tell lot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(scientist, question theory)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory)