expert: answer question

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings analyst
Weight: 0.76
, author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
answer question 1.00
answer that question 0.99
answer lot of question 0.96
answer tough question 0.91
object to question 0.86
object to line of question 0.84
question theory 0.84
question that theory 0.84
supply that answer 0.81
question witness 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question theory)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, object to question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(scientist, question theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(scientist, question theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lawyer, question witness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(expert, answer question)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(expert, answer that question)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(expert, answer tough question)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(expert, supply that answer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(expert, answer that question)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(expert, supply that answer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(expert, supply that answer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(expert, answer tough question)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(expert, supply that answer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(scientist, question theory)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness)