expert: answer that question

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings analyst
Weight: 0.76
, author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
answer that question 1.00
answer question 0.99
answer lot of question 0.96
answer tough question 0.91
question that theory 0.86
object to question 0.86
question theory 0.84
supply that answer 0.84
object to line of question 0.84
question that theory with new observation 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question theory)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(scientist, question theory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(scientist, question theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory with new observation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory with new observation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(expert, answer that question)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(expert, answer question)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(expert, answer tough question)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(expert, answer question)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(expert, supply that answer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(expert, supply that answer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(expert, supply that answer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(expert, supply that answer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(expert, answer tough question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(scientist, question theory)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory with new observation)