expert: answer tough question

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings analyst
Weight: 0.76
, author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
answer tough question 1.00
answer lot of question 0.92
answer question 0.91
answer that question 0.91
object to question 0.78
question that theory 0.78
object to line of question 0.78
question theory 0.77
supply that answer 0.76
has good understand of specific topic 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question theory)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(scientist, question that theory)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(scientist, question that theory)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(scientist, question that theory)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(scientist, question theory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(scientist, question theory)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(expert, answer tough question)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(expert, has good understand of specific topic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(expert, supply that answer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(expert, supply that answer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(expert, answer question)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(expert, supply that answer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(expert, answer that question)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(expert, has good understand of specific topic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(expert, has good understand of specific topic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(expert, answer question)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(expert, answer that question)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(expert, has good understand of specific topic)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(expert, supply that answer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(expert, answer tough question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(scientist, question theory)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scientist, question that theory)