expert: be bad predicting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad predicting 1.00
predict war 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(expert, be bad predicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(expert, be bad predicting)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(expert, be bad predicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(expert, predict war)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(expert, be bad predicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(expert, predict war)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(expert, be bad predicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(expert, predict war)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(expert, be bad predicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(expert, predict war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(expert, be bad predicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expert, be bad predicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(expert, be bad predicting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(expert, be bad predicting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expert, be bad predicting)