expert: describe rate as unsustainable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
describe rate as unsustainable 1.00
describe rate of fuels as unsustainable 0.96
describe rate of fossil fuels as unsustainable 0.91
describe rate 0.86
describe rate of fuels 0.83
describe rate of fossil fuels 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(expert, describe rate of fuels as unsustainable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(expert, describe rate of fuels)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(expert, describe rate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(expert, describe rate of fossil fuels as unsustainable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(expert, describe rate)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(expert, describe rate of fuels as unsustainable)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(expert, describe rate of fuels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(expert, describe rate of fuels as unsustainable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(expert, describe rate of fossil fuels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(expert, describe rate of fossil fuels as unsustainable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(expert, describe rate of fossil fuels as unsustainable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(expert, describe rate of fossil fuels as unsustainable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(expert, describe rate of fossil fuels)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(expert, describe rate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(expert, describe rate of fuels as unsustainable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(expert, describe rate of fuels)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(expert, describe rate of fossil fuels)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(expert, describe rate of fossil fuels)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(expert, describe rate)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(expert, describe rate of fuels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(expert, describe rate as unsustainable)