expert: estimate size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
estimate size 1.00
estimate size of oil fields 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(expert, estimate size)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(expert, estimate size)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(expert, estimate size)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(expert, estimate size of oil fields)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(expert, estimate size)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(expert, estimate size of oil fields)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(expert, estimate size)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(expert, estimate size of oil fields)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(expert, estimate size)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expert, estimate size of oil fields)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(expert, estimate size)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(expert, estimate size)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(expert, estimate size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(expert, estimate size)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(expert, estimate size)