expert: good novice

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings analyst
Weight: 0.76
, author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
good novice 1.00
train novice 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(expert, good novice)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(expert, good novice)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(expert, good novice)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(expert, train novice)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(expert, good novice)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(expert, train novice)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(expert, good novice)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(expert, train novice)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(expert, good novice)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(expert, train novice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(expert, good novice)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(expert, good novice)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(expert, good novice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.01
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(expert, good novice)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(expert, good novice)