expert: judge dog show

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings analyst
Weight: 0.76
, author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
judge dog show 1.00
prove to judge 0.84
present your case to court 0.76
rest his case in court 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case in court)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lawyer, prove to judge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case in court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(expert, judge dog show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(expert, judge dog show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(expert, judge dog show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(expert, judge dog show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest his case in court)