explanation: be crucial in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents answer
Weight: 0.69
, description
Weight: 0.64
, reference
Weight: 0.64
, consequence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings theory
Weight: 0.71
, excuse
Weight: 0.71
, detail
Weight: 0.63
, information
Weight: 0.60
, question
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be crucial in science 1.00
be important to science 0.92
be key element of economics 0.79
be important in teaching 0.76
be in science tentative 0.76
be important in public health 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in teaching)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(question, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(question, be important in teaching)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in public health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(explanation, be crucial in science)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(explanation, be important to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(explanation, be key element of economics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(explanation, be in science tentative)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(explanation, be key element of economics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(explanation, be in science tentative)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(explanation, be key element of economics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(explanation, be in science tentative)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be in science tentative)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be key element of economics)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(explanation, be crucial in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(question, be important in teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(theory, be important in public health)