explanation: improve ones confidence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents answer
Weight: 0.69
, description
Weight: 0.64
, reference
Weight: 0.64
, consequence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings theory
Weight: 0.71
, excuse
Weight: 0.71
, detail
Weight: 0.63
, information
Weight: 0.60
, question
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve ones confidence 1.00
has quality better 0.77
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(explanation, improve ones confidence)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(description, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(explanation, improve ones confidence)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(description, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reference, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(description, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(excuse, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(question, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(description, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(question, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(question, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(excuse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(excuse, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(explanation, improve ones confidence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(explanation, improve ones confidence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(description, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(question, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(excuse, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(description, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)