explosion: has quality change

Related concepts

Parents	accident Weight: 0.74 , hazard Weight: 0.64 , loud noise Weight: 0.63 , event Weight: 0.61
Siblings	blast Weight: 0.65 , fire Weight: 0.62 , grenade Weight: 0.54 , gunfire Weight: 0.51 , plane crash Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality change	1.00
has quality bad	0.86
be considered change	0.81
is chemical change	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(grenade, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(fire, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(fire, is chemical change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(fire, is chemical change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(fire, is chemical change)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(grenade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(grenade, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(fire, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(fire, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(explosion, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(explosion, be considered change)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(explosion, be considered change)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(explosion, be considered change)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(explosion, be considered change)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(explosion, is chemical change)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(explosion, is chemical change)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(explosion, is chemical change)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(explosion, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(explosion, is chemical change)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(explosion, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(explosion, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(explosion, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(grenade, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(fire, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(fire, is chemical change)