extinction: harm ecosystems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
harm ecosystems 1.00
affect biodiversity 0.83
affect other species 0.80
affect species 0.80
reduce biodiversity 0.79
endanger diversity 0.79
result in biodiversity 0.79
affect ecosytem 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(speciation, result in biodiversity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(speciation, result in biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(speciation, result in biodiversity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(extinction, result in biodiversity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(extinction, affect biodiversity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(extinction, affect biodiversity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, result in biodiversity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(extinction, affect other species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(extinction, endanger diversity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(extinction, result in biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(extinction, affect ecosytem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(extinction, reduce biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(extinction, reduce biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(extinction, affect species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(extinction, result in biodiversity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(extinction, reduce biodiversity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(extinction, affect species)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(extinction, reduce biodiversity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(extinction, affect biodiversity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(extinction, affect biodiversity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(extinction, affect ecosytem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(extinction, affect species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(extinction, affect ecosytem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(extinction, affect species)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(extinction, affect ecosytem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(extinction, endanger diversity)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(extinction, affect other species)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(extinction, endanger diversity)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(extinction, affect other species)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(extinction, endanger diversity)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(extinction, affect other species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(extinction, harm ecosystems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extinction, harm ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(speciation, result in biodiversity)