extinction: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
is concern now 0.95
is major concern 0.92
is major concern now 0.91
has state problem 0.84
is serious problem 0.77
be considered problem 0.77
be considered major problem 0.76
is problem now 0.76
is major problem now 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(extinction, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(extinction, is concern now)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(extinction, is concern now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, is problem now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(extinction, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern now)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern now)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern now)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern now)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(extinction, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)