extinction: is concern now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is concern now 1.00
has state concern 0.95
is major concern now 0.94
is major concern 0.92
is problem now 0.83
is major problem now 0.80
be considered problem 0.79
is serious problem 0.79
has state problem 0.78
be considered major problem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(extinction, is concern now)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, is problem now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state concern)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(extinction, has state concern)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(extinction, has state concern)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(extinction, has state concern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(extinction, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern now)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern now)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern now)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(extinction, is concern now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state concern)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)