extinction: is environmental problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is environmental problem 1.00
is serious environmental problem 0.95
has state problem 0.80
is major problem 0.79
is serious problem 0.79
is problem now 0.79
is major problem now 0.78
be considered problem 0.78
be considered major problem 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(extinction, is environmental problem)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, is problem now)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(extinction, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(extinction, is serious environmental problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(extinction, is serious environmental problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(extinction, is environmental problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)