extinction: is major

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is major 1.00
is major problem 0.88
is major problem now 0.86
be considered major problem 0.86
is major concern now 0.84
is major concern 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(extinction, is major)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern now)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(extinction, is major)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)