extinction: is major problem now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents catastrophe
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, process
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings overpopulation
Weight: 0.31
, starvation
Weight: 0.31
, evolution
Weight: 0.31
, global warming
Weight: 0.31
, speciation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is major problem now 1.00
is major problem 0.98
be considered major problem 0.95
is problem now 0.92
is major concern now 0.90
is serious problem 0.88
has state problem 0.87
is major 0.86
be considered problem 0.86
is major concern 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, is problem now)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(extinction, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern now)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern now)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(extinction, is major)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(extinction, is major)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major)