extinction: is problem now

Related concepts

Parents	catastrophe Weight: 0.53 , concept Weight: 0.52 , process Weight: 0.51 , problem Weight: 0.49 , topic Weight: 0.49
Siblings	overpopulation Weight: 0.31 , starvation Weight: 0.31 , evolution Weight: 0.31 , global warming Weight: 0.31 , speciation Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is problem now	1.00
is major problem now	0.92
has state problem	0.92
be considered problem	0.91
is major problem	0.88
is serious problem	0.88
be considered major problem	0.85
is concern now	0.83
is major concern now	0.80
is environmental problem	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(global warming, has state problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(global warming, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(global warming, has state problem)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(extinction, is problem now)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered problem)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(extinction, be considered problem)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered problem)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(extinction, has state problem)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(extinction, has state problem)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(extinction, is environmental problem)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(extinction, be considered major problem)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(extinction, be considered problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(extinction, has state problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(extinction, is environmental problem)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major problem now)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(extinction, be considered major problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(extinction, is concern now)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(extinction, is concern now)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(extinction, is major problem now)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(extinction, is concern now)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(extinction, is environmental problem)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is concern now)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(extinction, be considered major problem)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(extinction, has state problem)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(extinction, is major problem now)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is major concern now)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(extinction, is major problem now)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(extinction, is major concern now)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is environmental problem)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(extinction, is major concern now)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(extinction, be considered major problem)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(extinction, is major concern now)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(extinction, is problem now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(global warming, has state problem)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(extinction, is problem now) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)