extra: be on television shows paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.53
, television show
Weight: 0.52
, show
Weight: 0.50
, tv show
Weight: 0.50
, role
Weight: 0.49
Siblings free time
Weight: 0.32
, time out
Weight: 0.32
, time machine
Weight: 0.31
, happy hour
Weight: 0.30
, do
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on television shows paid 1.00
be on television shows 0.95
be in tv shows 0.88
be paid 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(extra, be on television shows paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(extra, be in tv shows)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(extra, be in tv shows)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(extra, be in tv shows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(extra, be on television shows)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(extra, be in tv shows)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(extra, be on television shows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(extra, be on television shows)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(extra, be on television shows)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(extra, be paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(extra, be paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(extra, be paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(extra, be paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(extra, be on television shows paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(extra, be on television shows paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(extra, be on television shows paid)