eyeliner: be at cosmetic department

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, makeup
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.46
, lip
Weight: 0.45
Siblings moisturizer
Weight: 0.34
, lipstick
Weight: 0.34
, hair gel
Weight: 0.34
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.33
, suntan lotion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cosmetic department 1.00
be at many cosmetic 0.92
be at cosmetic case 0.92
be used to conceal cosmetic flaw 0.78
be buy at department store 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(makeup, be used to conceal cosmetic flaw)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(makeup, be used to conceal cosmetic flaw)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(makeup, be used to conceal cosmetic flaw)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(moisturizer, be at many cosmetic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(moisturizer, be at cosmetic case)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(suntan lotion, be buy at department store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(makeup, be used to conceal cosmetic flaw)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(moisturizer, be at cosmetic case)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(moisturizer, be at cosmetic case)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(moisturizer, be at many cosmetic)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(moisturizer, be at many cosmetic)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(suntan lotion, be buy at department store)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(suntan lotion, be buy at department store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.01
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(makeup, be used to conceal cosmetic flaw)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suntan lotion, be buy at department store)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(moisturizer, be at many cosmetic)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(moisturizer, be at cosmetic case)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(eyeliner, be at cosmetic department)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(makeup, be used to conceal cosmetic flaw)