face: be blurred on impractical jokers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents target
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, sign
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings eye socket
Weight: 0.48
, blush
Weight: 0.42
, spud
Weight: 0.35
, smack
Weight: 0.34
, stop sign
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be blurred on impractical jokers 1.00
be blurred on jokers 0.92
be blurred out in pictures 0.82
is blurred 0.82
be blurred on tv 0.82
be blurred on google maps 0.80
be blurred on prank channels 0.79
be blurred on live pd 0.77
be blurred on pd 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(face, be blurred on tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(face, be blurred on tv)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(face, be blurred on tv)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(face, be blurred on google maps)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(face, be blurred on live pd)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(face, be blurred on google maps)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(face, be blurred on tv)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(face, be blurred on google maps)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(face, be blurred on live pd)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(face, be blurred on google maps)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(face, be blurred on live pd)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(face, be blurred on live pd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(face, be blurred on impractical jokers)