face: face training better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents target
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, sign
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings eye socket
Weight: 0.48
, blush
Weight: 0.42
, spud
Weight: 0.35
, smack
Weight: 0.34
, stop sign
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
face training better 1.00
face training 0.97
has physical part face 0.81
face interaction better 0.79
be called face 0.78
be called two face 0.77
face communication important 0.77
face communication 0.76
was called face 0.76
face communication most effective 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(face, face training better)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(face, has physical part face)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(face, has physical part face)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(face, has physical part face)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(face, face interaction better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(face, be called two face)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(face, face communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(face, face interaction better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(face, face interaction better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(face, be called two face)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(face, be called two face)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(face, face communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(face, face communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(face, face communication important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(face, face communication most effective)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(face, face communication important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(face, face communication most effective)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(face, face communication important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(face, face communication most effective)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(face, has physical part face)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(face, face interaction better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication most effective)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(face, be called two face)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(face, face training better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(face, face training better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(face, face training better)