face: has fatness fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents target
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, sign
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings eye socket
Weight: 0.48
, blush
Weight: 0.42
, spud
Weight: 0.35
, smack
Weight: 0.34
, stop sign
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has fatness fat 1.00
be fat last go 0.83
be called fat face 0.81
was called fat face 0.81
get fatter with age 0.76
be weight 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(body part, be weight)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(face, has fatness fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(body part, be weight)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(body part, be weight)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(body part, be weight)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(face, has fatness fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(face, has fatness fat)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(face, be fat last go)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(face, be fat last go)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(face, be called fat face)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(face, be called fat face)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(face, was called fat face)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(face, was called fat face)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(face, be fat last go)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(face, be called fat face)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(face, was called fat face)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(face, get fatter with age)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(face, get fatter with age)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(face, get fatter with age)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(face, be fat last go)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(face, be called fat face)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(face, was called fat face)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(face, get fatter with age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(face, has fatness fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(body part, be weight)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(face, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(body part, be weight)