face: was called fat face

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents target
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, sign
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings eye socket
Weight: 0.48
, blush
Weight: 0.42
, spud
Weight: 0.35
, smack
Weight: 0.34
, stop sign
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was called fat face 1.00
be called fat face 0.99
was called face 0.88
be fat last go 0.87
be called face 0.86
be called two face 0.82
has fatness fat 0.81
has physical part face 0.80
be named face 0.79
be called north face 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(face, was called fat face)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(face, be called fat face)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(face, be called fat face)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(face, be called fat face)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(face, be fat last go)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(face, be fat last go)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(face, be fat last go)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(face, be called two face)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(face, be called two face)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(face, be called two face)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(face, has fatness fat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(face, has fatness fat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(face, has physical part face)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(face, has physical part face)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(face, has physical part face)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(face, be called north face)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(face, be called north face)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(face, has fatness fat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(face, be called north face)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(face, be called fat face)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(face, be fat last go)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(face, has fatness fat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(face, be called north face)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(face, be called two face)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(face, has physical part face)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(face, was called fat face)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(face, was called fat face)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(face, was called fat face)