fact: is interesting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents omission
Weight: 0.65
, element
Weight: 0.63
, consequence
Weight: 0.63
, way
Weight: 0.63
Siblings conversation
Weight: 0.61
, surprise
Weight: 0.60
, axiom
Weight: 0.54
, conjecture
Weight: 0.52
, sabah
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is interesting 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fact, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(conversation, is interesting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fact, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(conversation, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(conversation, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fact, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fact, is interesting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fact, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fact, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fact, is interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fact, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fact, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fact, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(conversation, is interesting)