factory: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturing
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brewery
Weight: 0.57
, tannery
Weight: 0.47
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, warehouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be harmful to environment 0.86
has quality bad 0.80
affect climate 0.78
poison environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(power plant, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(factory, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(factory, be harmful to environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(factory, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(factory, be harmful to environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(factory, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factory, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(factory, be harmful to environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(factory, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(factory, be harmful to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(factory, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(factory, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(factory, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power plant, be bad for environment)