factory: be fitted with tall chimneys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturing
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brewery
Weight: 0.57
, tannery
Weight: 0.47
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, warehouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fitted with tall chimneys 1.00
have tall chimneys 0.95
have chimneys 0.90
have long chimneys 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(power plant, have chimneys)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(power plant, have chimneys)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(power plant, have chimneys)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factory, have tall chimneys)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factory, have chimneys)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(factory, have long chimneys)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(factory, have chimneys)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factory, have chimneys)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(factory, have tall chimneys)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(factory, have tall chimneys)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(factory, have long chimneys)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(factory, have long chimneys)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(factory, have tall chimneys)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(factory, have chimneys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(factory, have long chimneys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(factory, be fitted with tall chimneys)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(power plant, have chimneys)