factory: be in north

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturing
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.68
, brewery
Weight: 0.57
, tannery
Weight: 0.47
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, warehouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in north 1.00
is near 0.81
be located in rural areas 0.79
be located outside of cities 0.79
be near water 0.79
be located in areas 0.79
be located outside of major cities 0.78
be built near rivers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be near water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(power plant, be near water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(power plant, be near water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(factory, be in north)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factory, is near)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(factory, be located outside of major cities)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(factory, be located outside of major cities)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(factory, be located outside of major cities)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(factory, be located in rural areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(factory, be located in rural areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(factory, be located in rural areas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(factory, be built near rivers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(factory, be built near rivers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(factory, be built near rivers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factory, be located outside of major cities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(factory, be located in rural areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(factory, be built near rivers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(factory, be near water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(factory, be near water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(factory, is near)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(factory, be near water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(factory, be near water)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(factory, is near)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(factory, is near)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(factory, be in north)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factory, be in north)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(factory, be in north)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(power plant, be near water)