factory: were powered in 1877

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturing
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brewery
Weight: 0.57
, tannery
Weight: 0.47
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, warehouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were powered in 1877 1.00
were powered in 1800s 1.00
be powered 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be powered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(power plant, be powered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(power plant, be powered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(factory, were powered in 1877)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(factory, be powered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(factory, were powered in 1800s)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(factory, were powered in 1800s)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(factory, were powered in 1800s)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(factory, were powered in 1800s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factory, be powered)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(factory, be powered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(factory, be powered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(factory, were powered in 1877)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(factory, were powered in 1877)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(factory, were powered in 1877) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(power plant, be powered)