fail: zoom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.50
, time
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.45
, reference
Weight: 0.44
Siblings want
Weight: 0.31
, do
Weight: 0.31
, impossible
Weight: 0.30
, proper noun
Weight: 0.30
, doom
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
zoom 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fail, zoom)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(doom, zoom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fail, zoom)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(doom, zoom)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(doom, zoom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fail, zoom)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(fail, zoom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(fail, zoom)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fail, zoom)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fail, zoom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fail, zoom)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fail, zoom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fail, zoom)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(doom, zoom)