failure: be considered as good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mistake
Weight: 0.67
, breach
Weight: 0.65
, disappointment
Weight: 0.61
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
Siblings heart failure
Weight: 0.77
, omission
Weight: 0.66
, negligence
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.61
, flat tire
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as good thing 1.00
be considered as thing 0.97
is good thing 0.93
is even thing 0.89
is thing 0.89
is same thing 0.85
be good 0.84
be regarded as difficult 0.84
be thought as as process 0.84
be considered in two way process 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(disappointment, is thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(disappointment, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, is good thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(disappointment, is thing)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(failure, be considered as good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(failure, is good thing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(failure, is good thing)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as thing)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(failure, is good thing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(failure, is thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(failure, be good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(failure, be considered as thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, is good thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, is same thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(failure, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(failure, is same thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(failure, is same thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(failure, is thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(failure, is same thing)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(failure, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(disappointment, is thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(disappointment, is thing)